Paul Heinz

Original Fiction, Music and Essays

When Less Is More

From time to time in my blog I’d like to highlight music that contributes something of interest.  This week, I’m including a clip of one of my all-time favorite solos, provided by The Dave Matthews Band’s saxophonist Leroi Moore, who died tragically in 2008 from complications after an all-terrain vehicle accident. 

Providing a solo in a rock and roll song can lead to numerous outcomes: it can be electric, momentous, mind-baffling, stimulating, tear-inducing, dull, messy, sloppy, and – on occasion – absolutely perfect.  Although there's a time and a place for nearly every type of solo, the ones that typically appeal to me are melodious and sparse rather than infused with a gazzilion notes, which is why I’ve always preferred David Gilmore to Alex Lifeson, David Brubeck to Art Tatum and John Helliwell  (you might have to look him up) to say…Charlie Parker (which is an unfair comparison since they’re from different genres, but what the hell).

The solo from Leroi Moore below is from “What Would You Say,” the second song off The Dave Matthew Band's debut album, Under the Table and Dreaming.

Leroi spends almost a full four measures on only three different notes (concert E, G and A), a beautiful example of restraint for an accomplished musician, and it raises the tension of the song as the listener awaits a more conventional solo, which Leroi eventually provides.

When I’m playing, I’ve often found myself in the midst of solo and instead of coming up with something melodious, I've ended up just ripping through a blues scale as fast as my tension-filled fingers can muster.  But playing as fast as you can not only isn’t necessary, it’s far less interesting in most cases from a carefully selected group of notes that could serve as a sort of secondary melody. 

Consider the lead guitar Neil Schon plays in "Don't Stop Believing":

How much less of a song would it be if he hadn't added that memorable phrase?

Do you have a favorite solo you'd like to highlight?  If so, please post a comment and I'll try to mention it or provide clips for it in a future post. 

In the meantime, rest in peace, Mr. Moore.

Clutter is Nine-Tenths of our Tension

Image result for peter menzel home

In 1994 Peter J. Menzel published a book containing photographs of families standing in front of their homes with all their worldly possessions.  The cover of the book presents a family of four on a cul-de-sac with their lovely home behind them and a tidy display of sofas, tables, chairs, dressers, lamps, beds, a piano, bookshelves, photos in frames and every movable appliance, not to mention two cars parked in the driveway and a family dog.  Not shown in the photograph are all the books, papers, tools, binders, boxes, scrap wood, scrap shingles, scrap ANYthing, grilling equipment, pet toys, children's toys, knickknacks, dishes, glasses, snow shovels, power tools and lawn mowers.  In other words, the clutter has been removed from the equation, and what’s left is a display that makes American consumerism look reasonable, orderly and completely healthful.

But clutter is the culprit for much of the exasperation and tension in our lives.  My days are spent piling through bills, party invitations, receipts, CDs, homework, art projects, charity brochures, jumbo-sized paper goods packages from Costco and, more recently, microscopically-sized Legos scattered throughout every room of my house.   If my family and I were to put all our possessions in front of our bungalow, the Legos alone would take us into the next county.   

But despite my toil, I feel like I’ve made strides from the insane saving tendencies of my father. He's a SAVER, as important a word to describe him as husband, father and grandfather.  He's a step away from one of those people you see on Dr. Phil who can’t throw out anything and therefore has thirteen years worth of daily papers piled in his kitchen, or stacks of garbage sorted by matter-types, because you just never know when you’re going to need two-hundred and thirty two Styrofoam egg cartons.

In my father’s basement you’ll find a piece of broken brake line from a ’49 DeSoto that nearly cost him his life in the late 50s, two bedpans and a polio leg brace from his illness in 1949, a urinal that he recently justified having saved for sixty years by using it after knee surgery (I can hear him telling his wife, “See, I KNEW I’d put this to good use.”), papers he authored in college, screws and nails sorted neatly by type in old baby jars, classical LPs, a slew of binders and boxes upon boxes of negatives and prints.  Walking into his basement is like visiting a museum in which nothing is interesting.  Actually, that’s not entirely fair.  I do like his collection of beer bottles, childhood toys, old radios and cameras.  But then there’s the 8-foot by 4-foot model train display he and I worked on over thirty years ago but never finished; it still rests on its side, the plaster mountain we’d so carefully created during the 70s having been accidentally smashed during the move into his present home in 1988.  

My mother, by contrast, is a DISCARDER, and she lives an orderly life in an orderly house with no basement and only enough room in her garage for two cars.  It’s as if each of my parents purchased a home that only exasperated their ailments: my father can surrender to his saving illness because he’s got the room, and my mother can heed her discarding tendencies because she hasn’t got the room to do otherwise.  

Despite the idiom, “opposites attract,” SAVERS and DISCARDERS mix together about as well as water and sodium, and my childhood was therefore marked by two time periods:  the Accumulation Period, when my father’s predilections won out more often than not; and the Dumping Period, when my mother was finally free to listen to her “inner discarder,” starting with anything that contained a hint of my father’s existence.   An art project I brought home during the Accumulation Period likely rests to this very day in a box stored in my father’s basement.  An art project I brought home during the Dumping Period was likely disposed with that day’s dinner scraps.

So where does all this leave me?  I appear to have inherited both the saving and discarding traits to alarming effect: when I save, I’m tortured by a desire to organize and clear away the clutter to give me some semblance of order.  When I discard, I’m tortured by loss, sure that a piece of me has been left to rot in a landfill.  

There are moments when I imagine the sense of liberation that might come if my house were to suddenly burn down while the family is away.  Gone would be any ties to material things that matter nothing in the end: the piano books I learned from as a child, the drinking glasses I stole from an English Pub in 1989, the letters from old girlfriends, the papers I authored during my sophomore year in high school, the first pieces of furniture my wife and I purchased together, the photos, the LPs, the books.  And then I imagine Peter J. Menzel coming over the following day to photograph my family standing arm in arm, smiling proudly in front of the smoldering ashes, where a clutterless hole awaits to be filled by next year’s purchases, tension in waiting.

A Lyrical Education

The power of rock and roll, a force long acknowledged by astute listeners, may be broader than many had originally believed.  It seems that in addition to providing us with enjoyment, empathy and inspiration, rock and roll can also play a critical role in our education, a thought that occurred to me recently after witnessing my daughter’s defeat in a hard-fought game of Scrabble.  An unused “Q” left her with a ten-point deduction, a tough lesson for an eleven year-old, but it reminded me of another Scrabble contest from long ago.

In this particular match, my mother held a slim lead over my brother, who was having difficulty using his letter Z.  He couldn’t manage any of the usual words – zoo, zone, zip – in the crowded board of letters, but after pondering his predicament for a moment, he turned to his old friend rock and roll.  “I got it!” he shouted, and placed two letters on the board.  “F-E-Z.  Fez.  Double word score – thirty points!”   

He had no idea what the word meant, but he’d heard it on a recently acquired album by Steely Dan.  To prove it to my mother, he took out the album, The Royal Scam, and spun it on the turntable.  There was Donald Fagen singing, “I’m never gonna do it without the fez on.”  (a fez is a rimless hat, the kind Sydney Greenstreet wore in Casablanca).   

My mother, a fierce competitor, was no match against the power of rock and roll. Upon reflection, I now realize that fez was only one of probably hundreds of words I was introduced to as a child through music.  For better or for worse, rock lyrics helped educate me.  Words I’d never heard before – or at least never considered – crept into my consciousness in parallel to my musical immersion.  Just a cursory stroll through my memory highlights some of the words that were unknown to me before music: 

 Cynical – from Supertramp’s “The Logical Song” 

 Elusive – from Rush’s “The Spirit Of Radio” 

 Elude – from Pink Floyd’s “In The Flesh” 

 Coy – from Paul Simon’s “Fifty Ways To Leave Your Lover” 

 Melancholy – from Moody Blues’ “Melancholy Man” 

The list could go on and on.   

But in addition to expanding my vocabulary, lyrics helped educate me on other matters, providing an impetus for future explorations.  The Police exposed me to the author Nabakov.  The Alan Parson’s Project clued me into Edgar Allan Poe.  Rush inspired me to read Mark Twain and Ernest Hemmingway.  10,000 Maniacs introduced me to Jack Kerouac and the other beat writers.  It was as if rock and roll helped to fill in the gaping holes left by my educators. 

Music also helped enhance my proficiency with sexual phrases. Over time, I began to understand what “sugar walls,” “spread your wings,” “every inch of my love,” “red light,” and “love gun” implied, and other words entered my vocabulary.  In a family where the talk of sex was just short of taboo, music played an important role in helping me grow a bit more confident on the topic of sex by mastering its nomenclature, if not its practice.   

Lyrics even put the fear of God into me, albeit briefly.  In the 80s, the world of music couldn’t stop talking about bands hiding satanic messages in their songs, and my friend and I wore out record needles trying to decipher the backward messages in “Stairway To Heaven” and “Hotel California.”  State legislators apparently ruined a few needles of their own, for a bill was introduced in California to prevent subliminal messages that could “turn us into disciples of the Antichrist.”  I’m sure the taxpayers of California appreciated that.   

I guess the talk of Satan got to me eventually, for in high school I attended a pastor’s lecture at a local church on the topic of “Lyrics In Rock Music.”  The pastor, a decrepit, old man who probably considered Sony and Cher children of Satan, preached to the kids in the audience and warned them to guard their souls against the evils of rock and roll.  He was particularly critical of a Pink Floyd song I owned, “Sheep,” whose lyrics included a rather brutal version of Psalm 23 (“The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want…”), and I left the lecture feeling doomed.     

When I came home, my mother asked how things went.   

 “Fine,” I said.  “I’m going to hell.” 

She could have said something poetic, something about how the moral compass of a person comes from the inside, or some such message.   Instead, she simply said, “Don’t worry about it.  You’re a good kid.”  And it was exactly the right thing to say.   

I continued to listen to whatever I wanted, and grew up to be a reasonably decent person.  Today, my children enjoy a lot of the same music I listened to as a kid, and we’ve added other artists to our play lists who would no doubt have been the subject of the rock-hating pastor’s scorn years ago (something tells me the irony of Ben Folds’ “Satan Is My Master” would have been lost on this guy).

Now as I approach middle-age, music continues to shape me.  Just recently I listened to a Jason Mraz song called “Butterfly” – a sexually explicit tune that I must admit made me feel a little uneasy when first listening to it with my daughters – and I heard the word “vivify,” a word meaning “to bring to life” or “to animate.”  What a great word!  Rock and roll continues, ever so slowly, to educate me.   

And I can’t wait to use it on a triple word score.  



Copyright, 2025, Paul Heinz, All Right Reserved